No More Drilling in the Dark
Exposing the Hazards of Natural Gas Production and Protecting America’s Drinking Water and Wildlife Habitats
11-16-2011
//
Richard Forrest
In recent years, there has been explosive growth in
industry activities to extract natural gas from shale
formations located throughout America. While the growth
of the natural gas industry has provided some economic
benefits to local economies, it has also been accompanied
by growing public fears. In particular, concern and
opposition have centered on the process of hydraulic
fracturing (“fracking”) used to extract shale gas.
Download the full report: No More Drilling in the Dark (pdf)
This report provides an overview of unconventional gas
drilling and the key concerns and potential threats that
such drilling raises for America’s land, water, air and
wildlife. It also provides a number of recommendations for
addressing and reducing related environmental impacts.
While many potential impacts remain unknown, there
have been documented cases of pollution and impacts on
habitats that raise serious concerns. Fracking chemicals
and methane have contaminated underground water
resources. The clearing of forests for the construction of
drilling pads and access roads has fragmented habitats
and led to silt runoff. Drilling accidents have led to pollution
of streams and other water bodies. Fracking fluids have
been shown to be harmful or deadly for plants and animals.
Exhaust from drilling-related machinery has worsened air
pollution. Methane leakages have contributed to increased
emissions of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, which
scientists link to climate change and ocean acidification.
While some state and federal agencies have begun working
to respond to the growth of the industry and provide
improved regulation and oversight, much more needs to
be done. The National Wildlife Federation recommends a
number of actions to ensure that the development of
unconventional natural gas resources is pursued in an environmentally responsible manner. Needed improvements to regulatory frameworks
and industry practices include greater transparency, improved research and monitoring,
eliminating existing loopholes and exemptions from environmental laws, establishing
mitigation and compensation mechanisms, and improving practices to reduce impacts on
water resources and habitats.
To the extent that natural gas can be substituted for coal and oil — and especially if its use
can help us avoid energy sources such as tar sands and oil from risky offshore drilling —
there can be some environmental benefits. Nevertheless, natural gas produces greenhouse
gas emissions — and is a limited fossil fuel resource that will someday be depleted. It is
therefore no more than a temporary stopgap as our nation makes a necessary transition
to renewable energy sources.
America should choose
extraction practices that do not
endanger the long-term integrity
and health of our forests, rivers
and grasslands, and the wildlife
species that depend on them.
The National Wildlife Federation
will remain committed to
educating the public and
lawmakers about the risks posed
by unconventional natural gas
exploitation, and we will work
for the enactment of prudent
regulations to safeguard our
nation’s land, air, water
and wildlife.