From the 1930s to the early 1960s, my grandparents owned a wilderness retreat in the heart of the
swampy Mississippi Delta, and each spring the rising Mississippi River turned the area into a vast,
forested sea. When the wedge of muddy water backed up onto their land at Steele Bayou, my
grandparents entertained themselves by watching deer, bobcats and other wildlife migrate toward
the Indian mounds that remained dry. It was an annual ritual of "high water," as my
grandparents called it, and it had been going on for thousands of years.
Although the water sometimes rose as much as 30 feet and stayed for weeks at a time, I never
heard my grandparents use the word "flood," which would imply an unexpected,
disastrous event. To them, the yearly high tide was simply part of the natural rhythm of life in the
lower Delta.
It was in this lower Delta half a century ago that William Faulkner wrote about
how one of the
most prolific wilderness areas of North America was eventually cornered like a great bear, after
decades of land clearing and development had transformed higher ground into an almost unbroken
plain of row crops and towns. And it is here that the final battle over the Delta´s last wild
remnants is now being waged.
Today, my grandparents´ land is owned by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. It sits at ground
zero for a series of schemes designed by the Corps to drain and control flooding of the Delta once
and for all. The two most notable projects: a $62-million plan to dredge and clear more than 100
miles of the Big Sunflower River in order to reduce flooding by only a few inches a year; and the
construction of a mammoth, $150-million backwater pumping plant along Steele Bayou, which
would transfer floodwaters from one section of the Delta to another.
While the Army Corps is pushing ahead with the dredging of the Big Sunflower,
critics of both
plans question whether U.S. taxpayers should have to pay for projects that will benefit only a
small number of local landowners while destroying precious natural resources. As U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service biologist Curtis James told ABC News not long ago, "For the money spent
and the small reduction in flooding, it´s not worth it." At stake are thousands of acres of
some of the nation´s most productive wetlands and bottomland hardwood forests, including
cypress trees more than 1,000 years old, and a languorous river that nurtures what biologists
believe is the densest colony of freshwater mussels on the planet.
Lying between Memphis, Tennessee, and Vicksburg, Mississippi, the Mississippi Delta is not,
technically, the delta of the Mississippi River, but of its tributary, the Yazoo, which joins a
labyrinth of rivers, bayous and lakes to drain much of northern Mississippi. With a subtropical
climate, fertile soils and annual overflows, the Delta was once prime real estate for fish and
wildlife. But years ago agricultural interests made dramatic inroads into the remaining
wilderness.
In 1963, my grandparents saw their home and beloved woods bulldozed by the Corps. Their
property lay in the way of a system of levees, canals and the proposed Yazoo pumps, which were
designed to "protect" the lower Delta from interior and backwater flooding. The
levees would shut out the Mississippi River backwater, and the pumps would lift water from the
interior Delta and discharge it into the Mississippi. The goal was to make more land available for
agriculture, which meant getting the water out of the entire Delta for good.
The clearing of hundreds of thousands of acres of trees in the 1960s and 1970s--most of which
were merely pushed into windrows and burned--was devastating to wildlife. The floods,
meanwhile, persisted, and when the price of soybeans fell in the early 1980s, much of the new
land created by the Army Corps was abandoned. Today, a wildlife-based economy is emerging in
the lower Delta, with resorts offering hunting and fishing excursions as well as nonconsumptive
recreational opportunities like hiking and bird-watching. Meanwhile, thousands of acres have been
voluntarily reforested or enrolled in federal conservation programs. So why is the Corps
proceeding with its plans?
"You have to go back to the earlier authorization," says the Army Corps´ Vicksburg
District spokesman Michael Logue, referring to the early 1940s when Congress authorized the
most ambitious flood-control program in U.S. history in the Mississippi Delta. The Yazoo pumps
and Big Sunflower dredging projects are leftovers of that program; they are linked with upstream
flood-control works that have since been completed. By not finishing the overall plan, observes
Logue, "Essentially what you´re saying is the people upriver got theirs and these people [in
the lower Delta] can´t have theirs."
Joe Allen Woodard, who farms about 750 acres near Holly Bluff, Mississippi, is one of those
lower-Delta people, but he has a different take on things. He says the dredging of the Big
Sunflower "will destroy valuable ecosystems in the river, it will cause more erosion of the
river banks and is a waste of taxpayer dollars." Another local farmer, Jimmy Huff, who has
enrolled almost half of his 2,000 acres in federal conservation and wetland reserve programs
because they flooded frequently, is concerned that the dredging project "will actually
increase both flooding and erosion in the area." Already, according to Army Corps figures,
more than 200,000 acres of cleared land in the backwater area flood on average every five years,
some as often as twice a year.
For Paul Hartfield, the Big Sunflower project represents a threat to mussel beds that are
thousands of years old. A biologist with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service in Mississippi, he notes
that "the mussel beds in the Big Sunflower River represent probably the densest
accumulation of biomass anywhere in the world." As much as 100 pounds of mussels can be
found in a square meter of river bottom. "If we destroy them, we´ll be destroying the last bit
of aquatic ecosystem stability in the Mississippi Delta," he says.
Hartfield notes that the Corps has altered its plans for the Big Sunflower as a result of
negotiations over the past three or four years, but the dredging could still take out an estimated
40 percent of the mussel beds. And Tulane University geologist Barry Kohl worries that the
project could also release DDT trapped in river sediments, causing more environmental damage
downstream. The experts believe that the issue is not whether to have flood control, since some
flood control is essential, but where to draw the line.
Last fall, the National Wildlife Federation determined that the line was violated when the Army
Corps, in its plans to dredge the Big Sunflower, violated U.S. law. According to the federal Water
Resources Development Act, proposed water projects must have only a negligible impact on
wildlife and its habitat and their costs must be shared by local sponsors.
In the case of the Big Sunflower, the Corps maintains that its plans are exempt from this 1986 law
because the project amounts to nothing more than "maintenance" on a portion of the
river that was authorized for dredging by Congress in 1944. "The claim that this is
maintenance appears to be an end run around federal law," says John Harvey, president of
the Mississippi Wildlife Federation, an NWF affiliate. The National Wildlife Federation filed a
lawsuit against the U.S. government late last year to stop the project.
"It´s a senseless gouging of the taxpayer´s pocketbook," says Gerald Barber, a
Mississippi resident and voluntary chair of NWF´s Board of Directors.The Federation maintains
that flooding problems can be addressed with less-expensive approaches, such as conservation
easements that would give landowners incentives to reforest lands.
Such approaches could lessen the need for another controversial flood-control scheme, the Yazoo
pump project. This ambitious plan involves building the world´s largest pumps, which would lift
10,000 cubic feet of water per second from Steele Bayou and the Big Sunflower into the Yazoo
near its confluence with the Mississippi. The volume is equivalent to the average flow of the
Delaware River, which would be added to the Mississippi´s flow during floods.
How many people will benefit from such an expensive project? The Army Corps cannot say for
sure, but critics maintain that the number may be as low as a few dozen and that flooding will be
reduced, but not eliminated, on their land.
While Congress was busy authorizing the Yazoo and Big Sunflower projects in the 1940s, my
grandparents were blissfully ignorant of what lay ahead. Their Steele Bayou retreat was their idea
of paradise, with its ancient forests festooned with Spanish moss, its wooden skiffs tied up among
the cypress knees, even its mosquitoes, snakes and alligators. High water may have been an
occasional adversity, but it seemed to ensure that the lower Delta would remain a wilderness long
after most of the South´s forests had been overharvested or cleared for agriculture.
"Back in 1941, the mind-set of the U.S. government was that it never saw a wetland that
couldn´t be drained," said an editorial last summer in the Jackson, Mississippi,
Clarion-Ledger. "Times change. There simply isn´t a prevailing government need
anymore to drain land and provide more agricultural land." The state´s largest daily
newspaper went on to say: "When you add to this that the proposed project won´t solve
flooding, but only reduce it....What´s the point?" That´s a question taxpayers all across the
country should be asking.
Mississippi writer Alan Huffman still occasionally visits the lower
Delta, but because the Corps now owns his family´s land, he says, "There is really no going
back."
NWF Takes Action: Protecting the Delta´s
Resources
As part of its ongoing efforts to protect the nation´s wetlands, the National Wildlife Federation,
working with Trial Lawyers for Public Justice (TLPJ), has taken the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers to court to stop the Big Sunflower River dredging project. (TLPJ is a national
public-interest law firm.) NWF is also working to persuade the Corps to abandon its Yazoo
backwater pumps project.
With its affiliate the Mississippi Wildlife Federation and other groups, NWF has also initiated an
education effort to promote alternatives to the proposed federal flood-control plans. "Such
commonsense alternatives as the purchase of flood easements are cheaper and cause less
environmental damage than the projects planned by the Army Corps," says Susan Rieff,
senior director of NWF´s Gulf States Natural Resource Center. "They also yield more
permanent flood-control benefits."
To stay informed about this issue, see the following web sites: www.nwf.org/lowermississippi/ or www.tlpj.org; or the NWF Gulf States Field Office.